Which of the following would likely indicate a bid tailoring scheme?

The indication of a bid tailoring scheme is best represented by unusually broad specifications. In the context of bid processes, unusually broad specifications can suggest that the requirements of the bid are intentionally vague or flexible to allow a specific supplier to meet them more easily than others. This practice can facilitate favoritism and manipulative bidding behavior, allowing a particular supplier to gain an unfair advantage over competitors who are unable to meet the less specific criteria.

When specifications are broadly defined, it may enable the manipulator to align their product or service offerings to match the specifications, while other bidders may struggle to do so. This scenario is indicative of a compromised bidding process where integrity and competition are undermined by the tailoring of criteria to benefit a specific party.

In contrast, other options present characteristics of a fair bidding process. A high number of competitive awards to different suppliers suggests a healthy competition environment rather than manipulation. Several bidders responding to requests generally illustrates a competitive marketplace, and clear bid submission instructions typically help ensure transparency and fairness in the bidding process. Therefore, these elements are less characteristic of a bid tailoring scheme.