Which of the following is NOT a legitimate problem situation that may necessitate change orders in construction loans?

Change orders in construction loans are amendments made to the original agreement, generally due to unforeseen issues or necessary modifications during a project. The selection that correctly identifies a scenario that does not represent a legitimate problem necessitating change orders is based on the nature and context of the problem presented.

When design changes are requested, it typically reflects a need for adaptation or improvement that stakeholders, such as the contractor or the client, identify as essential for the project’s success. Such changes generally fall within the purview of normal project evolution and require formal documentation and agreement but do not arise out of problems or unforeseen circumstances. This intentional alteration contrasts with other scenarios that involve complications or challenges that necessitate changes due to problems, thus categorically distinguishing it from legitimate concerns warranting change orders.

In contrast, collusive bidding represents a serious ethical issue that undermines the integrity of the bidding process and can impact project funding. Likewise, discovering shortcuts that lead to other problems highlights deficiencies in project execution that might necessitate change orders to address the emerging issues effectively. Also, if the original project is deemed not feasible, it indicates a fundamental flaw that could jeopardize the entire endeavor and provoke the need for extensive changes to either the plan itself or the scope of execution.

Understanding these distinctions is