What is a method used to prove corrupt payments?

Secretly recording payment negotiations serves as a compelling method to prove corrupt payments because it provides direct evidence of the discussions, intent, and agreements between parties involved in the payment process. This method can capture real-time interactions, allowing investigators to uncover the nature of the agreements, establish parties' knowledge of improper conduct, and potentially reveal coercive or underhanded tactics used to facilitate corruption.

This approach not only shows the existence of corrupt payments but also identifies the behaviors and communications that surround such transactions. The recording can serve as a powerful piece of evidence in legal proceedings, presenting an unfiltered glimpse into the dynamics of the corruption, including any attempts to hide or manipulate these transactions.

Other options, while valuable in their own right, may not provide as definitive proof of corrupt activities. Regular audits could identify anomalies but might not capture the context or intention behind payments. Interviewing employees can gather insights but relies on subjective accounts and may miss crucial moments of negotiation. Infiltrating company systems could provide access to transactions but often involves legal and ethical complexities, potentially compromising the integrity of the investigation.